I noted previously that the media had started to twist Ivey's words. Soon they will begin to assassinate his character. Ivey is such a generous person who would spend money he earned on charity drives, just need to start playing hard ball with those that tried to push him around.
In my research on Ivey, I discovered that he had a net win of £9 million from baccarat alone. The other casinos with a share of contributing to the winning will soon join Borgata to sue Ivey for "fraudulent winnings".
As this issue gets to the legal arena, interpretation of the law and mutating of words will be the name of the game. I tried to look at keys that would affect this case.
More on My Webpage.
Card marking is cheating. Edge sorting is advantage play.
ReplyDeleteWhy can't they just tell Ivey he is "too good" like they did to new batman actor?
DeleteBaccarat is a game of chance. They did not believe Ivey can beat the game. They had concluded that he is cheating. With that bias they will not declare him as an advantage player.
DeleteFurthermore if they declare him as an advantage player they had already lost. Letting him go and hoping to view the video for signs of cheating is one way to recover the money. When Crocksford case came to light, they knew it was edge sorting and they are just hoping the could recover the money through legal means.
DeleteSo it is all about greed greed, eh.
DeleteOn the surface, stupid attempts to hides greed.
ReplyDeleteLet stupidity hide your cheating heart. That is is so convenient.
DeleteWould the court pass edge sorting as card marking?
ReplyDelete